This page written circa 22 December, 2004.
Around the turn of the second-last century,
Alberto Santos-Dumont commented to his friend
Louis Cartier that as an aviator he found it
difficult to consult his pocket watch, and
would it not be handy if it could reside on his
wrist. Cartier did the design as a piece of
jewelry as much as a piece of technology.
It was one of the all-time brilliant commercial successes.
The digital watch was merely an evolutionary step.
Modern terminology calls a step forward like
this a ``killer ap'', a term borrowed from
computer jargon. The PC moved mainstream only
when it ran a spreadsheet, the first `killer ap'.
Together the PC and the spreadsheet kick-started one of
the major revolutions of the 20th century.
In 1979, I was wont to reflect that my new microwave oven was one of the
very few truly new inventions of the age: It was a quantum leap for the
common Western consumer.
The magnetron had been around for decades, it was tweaking it to a
water absorption line and putting it in a
kitchen that was the brilliance.
Separate in your mind the ideas of a `killer ap' and a new technology.
The magnetron is the new technology, the microwave oven is the killer
ap. The microprocessor is the new technology, the spreadsheet, computer
game, or word processor are killer aps. New technologies are usually
costly, hard-fought advances, killer aps are small ideas. It is a
conjunction that leads to big bucks.
In this century we understand not only the killer ap but penetration
statistics. For instance, it took 50 years from its first commercial
release for electricity to penetrate 25% of US homes, but 35 for the
telephone, 22 for radio, 26 for TV, 15 for the PC and then the
cellphone, but 7 for the internet and the DVDR is expected to take only
5. Not quite a clean comparison: The DVDR is merely replacing the VCR
and it looks like a CD; relative costs vary, etc. The message is that
people expect and adopt new things these days.
The digital camera has been smoothly overtaking the film camera for some
time, as the electronic watch displaced the clockwork version. It is
said that the digital camera is now losing its popularity, ousted by
`appliances' such as phones and PDAs that contain the camera as something of
an afterthought. This is not unthinkable, as the mode imaging
capability (3 megapixels and 3x zoom) shrinks to be smaller than the
battery that powers it; nevertheless I see the digital equivalent of the SLR
camera having a much longer reign than the digital, free-standing
equivalent of the disposable camera.
About a year ago I received a small package in the mail.
It contained a Gillette Mach3 razor and one blade and no words.
I figured it was some silly marketing ploy, but at least I'd get a few
shaves for nothing.
It was a marketing ploy, but this 3-blade razor proved to be a
genuine advance, vastly better than any other razor I
have used. Recently a column in Spectrum mentioned how
brilliant the Mach3 was, though in comparison the latest battery-powered
version was a waste of time.
The time of the music video passes. Is the radio star doomed? No.
Music remains, carried about in iPods,
converted from CDs, bought from iTunes, gathered
off the peers of the net by BitTorrent, or half-bought from sites such
as AllOfMP3. The technology
changes, but the basic material remains almost unaltered.
When quizzed as to the previous century's greatest advances, many wise men
cited semiconductor electronics and the internet as the big waves.
The former has already had much of its impact, the latter still evolves fast.
The area I most like to watch is that of music and video content: Things
like Amazon
Theatre truly exploit a new channel in a new way, while
the RIAA goes under.
I love BitTorrent
because it causes a stir, but more because it is hammering a system
that has not adapted sensibly to the change.
Have times changed in the last 30 years? Are we really flooded with
innovations, or could I simply not see them when I was young?
I believe technology is moving faster, but the brilliant ideas,
the killer aps, come at about the same rate per capita.